drieuxster (drieuxster) wrote,
drieuxster
drieuxster

Holy Radical Judicial Activism By Those Black Robed Tyrannts

A divided U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that the police cannot enter a home and seize evidence without a warrant when one occupant agreed to the search after the other occupant refused permission.
...
The court's three most conservative members, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, opposed the ruling.

It was the first dissent written by Roberts, who joined the court at the end of September, and Justice David Souter sharply denounced it in writing for the majority. Under the dissent's view, he wrote, "The centuries of special protection for the privacy of the home are over."

[ cf Court rejects searches when occupants disagree (emphasis mine) ]
I mean, who would have thunk it that the Supreme's Would so openly offer aid and comfort to the enemy by not allowing warrentless searches of property.

What Next?

Will The Supreme's Start Ruling From Sharia as a part of their encouraging the Terrorists!
Subscribe

  • The men who stare at Goats

    Saw the film today. It was, as expected disturbing, and unsettling. But I think the adverts for the films before were even more unsettling. We walked…

  • Design gambits

    Hey kids, what if you had two competing cartridges? the S&W .44 and the .44 colt and you are competing to replace the old fashion, god fearing, all…

  • What should GlennBeckistania's response be to new bombing in Iraq?

    Hum.... GlennBeckIstanianista have been opposing the Commander In Chief. Now we have terrorist bombings in Baghdad also attacking the Commander In…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments