drieuxster (drieuxster) wrote,
drieuxster
drieuxster

Effective Threat Assessment.

Dirty Stinking Hippie gets confused by
It seems there may be a reason federal law-enforcement officials are not interested in pursuing serious charges against the white-supremacist tweakers who were caught this week in Denver: The man making the decision is a Republican operative. And when it came to a threat against John McCain by a black man, he had a completely different approach.
...
Hmmmm. Let's see: Men with rifles, a caches of other guns and ammo, all talking about killing Obama ... they're not a "serious threat." But a man in jail sending baby powder, well, that's a "serious threat."

[ cf The Obama Plotters: The Republican Double Standard In Law Enforcement Made Manifest ]
Let us put our thinking cap on here.

If the tweekers were a threat, they would be in the combat zone on the Eastern Front.

They are not in the combat Zone on the Eastern Front, therefore they are not a threat.

Simple Logic.

Darkies threatening White Christian America, Demonic EVIL!!!

Any questions?

{ update: Plot Against Obama "no credible threat" see, no credible threat.
Interesting work up on the basic ballistics, but I hate to disagree. Yes, the romance of a 7.62mm round is, well, romantic, but the M-16 is a .223 round, and it can still do it's killing at 750 yards, and with a scope and a ... so maybe, the problem here is that folks need to learn to understand when the State Security says to move along, people should just move along, or be detained as enemies of the state. }
Tags: war
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 5 comments