drieuxster (drieuxster) wrote,
drieuxster
drieuxster

Some IDE's Hate the Guacamole More Than Others...

So I use the cool search thingie to see if method FragFooFarWithWingNuttery() is actually used before I opt to say that we need neither it nor the settor, sit settor, sit....

And then opt to be passive aggressive and merely comment out the getter and settor, sit UBU! SIT!!!

Then suddenly not ONLY did the Tests START BURSTING INTO FLAMES, but the Evil Furry Burning Pit Of Overly Fuzzy Wuzzy Fun Friends From The Darker Korner Of Cleveland explodes OPEN!!! Sit Settor!!! Sit!!!

{ Think of the Tellie Tubbies if they had been really invented by the dark lords as invisioned by the Vast Right Wing Religious folks who really do not like Cleveland, or Tellie Tubbies on the Kommunist Dominiated PBS Death Rays.... SIT SETTOR!!! I Said Sit OR I am Going to be Quite Cross... }

So I am trying to put the method, and it's settor, back where it REALLY belongs in the inheritance hierarchy, which at times does look more like the line to succession to the Thrown!!!

Oh Merde.... that didn't fix it either...

Don't you hate it when Build Breakage starts leaking out all over the reality sphere???
Tags: geek_stuff, work
Subscribe

  • The men who stare at Goats

    Saw the film today. It was, as expected disturbing, and unsettling. But I think the adverts for the films before were even more unsettling. We walked…

  • Design gambits

    Hey kids, what if you had two competing cartridges? the S&W .44 and the .44 colt and you are competing to replace the old fashion, god fearing, all…

  • What should GlennBeckistania's response be to new bombing in Iraq?

    Hum.... GlennBeckIstanianista have been opposing the Commander In Chief. Now we have terrorist bombings in Baghdad also attacking the Commander In…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments