drieuxster (drieuxster) wrote,
drieuxster
drieuxster

ugly_thot: They had a name for it....

... ah yes, back in the dark days of darkness, there was a name for
Vice President Dick Cheney’s office was involved in removing statements on health risks posed by global warming from a draft of a health official’s Senate testimony last year, a former senior government environmental official said on Tuesday.

The former official, Jason K. Burnett, made the assertion and described similar incidents in a three-page letter to Senator Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat who is the chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. He then stood with her at a news conference at which she excoriated the Bush administration.

“History will judge this Bush administration harshly for recklessly covering up a real threat to the people they are supposed to protect,” Mrs. Boxer said.

[ cf Cheney’s Office Said to Edit Draft Testimony on Warming ]
Yes, our stalinist leftist friends might pitch, oh, say Lysenkoism - but that would be the same old failed policy of trying to protect the President....

What if the president needs to step out from hiding behind the skirts of Dear Old Dick, and give us all a clear breast of the moment, about how he was stabbed in the back by Dick and had no idea that there was a crazy old man running around as a loose cannon who was just one of the rougue ops run rampant without any control as a bad apple....

Because, come on folks, you are trying to tell me that in a Unitary Executive Principle, the Veep could be doing anything that was NOT THE DIRECT WILL OF GOD!!!

Thank God we have RoboBushCheney!!!
They Shiney!!!

They not like these disloyal dirty stinking hippies who would stab their friends in the back to stay clean...
Tags: bushcheney2008, science, war
Subscribe

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments