What would it really add to the real process?
I mean if we are to buy into the idea that the founding father's this, and the founding father's that, then gosh, wouldn't that mean that americans would want to understand why the founding father's worked so hard on things like the separation of church and state?
Why they did not like things like allowing TORTURE to be used to extract confessions that could be used in a trial case...
So if folks OPPOSE THE USE OF TORTURE to provide evidence in court cases, then how can they think that the so called military commissions, which are on record as willing to take in hearsay and evidence derived from torture, and evidence provided from persons whom the Prosecutor will not allow in the court or allow the defense to talk to....
So remind me again, why exactly do American NEED to have some form of Show Trial in GitMo?
Why not be more cost effective and simply line them up and put a bullet in their head?
I mean, we are in a time of transferring the tax liabilities unto the unborn baby UBU and all.
Could it be that americans, in the pit of their souls, still want that legal sugar candy coating that something almost like law stuff was done to do some sort of officially state sanctioned process prior to walking into their cells and capping off a round into the base of their skull....
Would this be a bad time to talk about the whole fiasco of 'catch and release' follies that have made the last how many years of failed "sweep and secure" operations in Iraq, well, just one Zippo Short of a full on God Fearing All American Zippo Sqaud.
Ah yes...
What law should be legal in america?