drieuxster (drieuxster) wrote,

But Renditioned Are NOT legally concerned...

I was so amused to find the whiners over at the MojoWire, well, forgetting the obvious.

Yes, it is true that there were efforts to protect americans from persons who Ate Diffferent as they noted
The idea was that a spike in, say, falafel sales, combined with other data, would lead to Iranian secret agents in the south San Francisco-San Jose area.

The brainchild of top FBI counterterrorism officials Phil Mudd and Willie T. Hulon, according to well-informed sources, the project didn’t last long. It was torpedoed by the head of the FBI’s criminal investigations division, Michael A. Mason, who argued that putting somebody on a terrorist list for what they ate was ridiculous — and possibly illegal.

[ cited at s9: Connaissez Vos Terroiristes! ]
and then they of course ILLEGALLY and Unpatriotically cite the Evil Wiki Entry: Maher_Arar - but of course, there is the reality that we accept, as noted
According to press reports, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice admitted during a House Foreign Affairs Committee Hearing today that the U.S. government mishandled the rendition of Center for Constitutional Rights client and Canadian citizen Maher Arar, saying, “I do not think this case was handled as it should have been. We do absolutely not wish to transfer anyone to any place in which they might be tortured.”
[ cf Secretary of State Rice Admits U.S. Government Mishandled Rendition of Maher Arar ]
Hence it obviously follows that he could not have been tortured, since that would not have been a nice thing.

Besides, as everyone knows, this guy was a Canadian, and as such, should never have been protected by american laws, since the super secret additional codicals that the founding father's put in place, allow that the american government can render anyone at anytime, for any reason, Irregardless what womyn like Rice say, and even more so in a time of transferring the tax liaibilities unto the unborn baby jesus!!!

Besides, as everyone knows, the State's Secrets Privilege means that when ever there is any chance of the tax cut, that the government is allowed to render anyone to the most cost effective torturer, as long as said persons are employed by an appopriate organization that has signed off on
Socially Responsible Corporate Torture
and therefore understand that the state's secrets must be protected no matter how many innocents may accidentally be rendered additional footage for television series like 24, or "those wacky torturers next door", the fun filled and exciting sit com about fun filled frolicking kids who have been able to make ends meet by setting up their very own
Socially Responsible Corporate Torture
system, complete with the e-torture option that allows folks the full fun on a full broadband internet connection to help in torturing anyone who might well be the sort of cash cow that both investors and consumers support!!!

I mean, would YOU want to oppose the virtue of the Free Market System simply because some antiquated old fuddy duddy's do not like the new groove of the modern e-tv tech go forward coolness????

I mean, you REALLY do not want to allow some collection of Black Robed Judicial Tyrannts to engage in Judicial Activism legislating from the bench against the very dictums that everyone knows comes from the award winning modern Television Shows that bring americans the very advertisements that keep them abreast of the very important things that they want to buy, and why we must keep torturing to keep our america american, and free from those who hate our american way of life....

Clearly IF the government allowed evidence to be brought into court indicating that anyone had been illegally detained and tortured, cf Khalid El-Masri who alledged that he had been illegally detained, and this was tossed by the US Supreme Court, on October 9th, 2007, because, well, it would have meant dealing with the special state secret's privilege, and besides, Khalid is not blonde, or anywhere coot enough...

So we can trust the government to do the right thing in a time of transferring the tax liabilities unto the unborn baby jesus....

therefore no matter whom we have to keep on torturing for tax cuts, that is what the bible is clear the unborn baby jesus would demand of us!!!!

anything less and the terrorists start taking away the tax cuts.

we can only hope that the folks at mojowire, are willing to do their patriotic duty...
Tags: torture, war

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.