drieuxster (drieuxster) wrote,
drieuxster
drieuxster

Oh say it is not so....

Oh dear, Oh ME!!! Oh My!!! Main stream media freaks out
Violent Muslim, Christian and Jewish extremists invoke the same rhetoric of "good" and "evil" and the best way to fight them is to tackle the problems that drive people to extremism, according to a report obtained by Reuters.

It said extremists from each of the three faiths often have tangible grievances -- social, economic or political -- but they invoke religion to recruit followers and to justify breaking the law, including killing civilians and members of their own faith.

The report was commissioned by security think tank EastWest Institute ahead of a conference on Thursday in New York titled "Towards a Common Response: New Thinking Against Violent Extremism and Radicalization." The report will be updated and published after the conference.

The authors compared ideologies, recruitment tactics and responses to violent religious extremists in three places -- Muslims in Britain, Jews in Israel and Christians in the United States.

"What is striking ... is the similarity of the worldview and the rationale for violence," the report said.

[ cf Religious extremists in 3 faiths share views ]
I sure hope they did not pay a whole lot of money on that report...

hum... I should of course high light
It said that while Muslims were often perceived by the West as "the principal perpetrators of terrorist activity," there are violent extremists of other faiths. Always focusing on Muslim extremists alienates mainstream Muslims, it said.

The report said it was important to examine the root causes of violence by those of different faiths, without prejudice.

"It is, in each situation, a case of 'us' versus 'them,"' it said. "That God did not intend for civilization to take its current shape; and that the state had failed the righteous and genuine members of that nation, and therefore God's law supersedes man's law."

[ op cit (emphasis mine)]
The comedy of course is that in america we do not like to think of the core problem of dangerous armed religious wackJobs who opt to take their 'textual literalisms', well, gosh, literally.

What if americans had to really decide which they wanted to really have? Their 'civic religion'? with the threat to the literalists that it provides? or the Literal Religion, with the threat to the civil society.

OR is there a third way?
Tags: religion, they_did_what, war
Subscribe

  • Who's Getting Who's Crazy On?

    Fox & MSNBC Reporters at Values Voters: Rude, Disruptive, Lazy - the folks at faith to action have another take on the values conference, where the…

  • We are on which side again?

    Student Wins Settlement After Teacher Burns Cross On His Arm - see also Creationist teacher sued in Ohio and the third in sequence - Public speaks…

  • Liberals Want To Impose EuroScience Upon America

    Fact is we never caught up to those socialists in Europe and - probably because they base decisions on science a little more than the average…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments