Most of the assertions in your letters to Sen. Leahy and in Ms. Goodling’s declaration do not constitute a valid basis for invoking the privilege against self-incrimination. The fact that a few Senators and Members of the House have expressed publicly their doubts about the credibility of the Attorney General and the Deputy Attorney General in their representations to Congress about the U.S. Attorneys’ termination does not in any way excuse your client from answering questions honestly and to the best of her ability. Of course, we expect (as we are sure you do) your client to tell the truth in any interview or testimony. The alleged concern that she may be prosecuted for perjury by the Department of Justice for fully truthful testimony is not only an unjustified basis for invoking the privilege and without reasonable foundation in this case but also so far as we know an unwarranted aspersion against her employer.As Good As It Gets....
[ cf House Judiciary Committee leaders challenge Monica Goodling's 5th Amendment claim ]
Here is some NeoConClownCarCrew Opo-Researcher out of her depth having not thought it through that her assertion against her now former employer basically asserts that the Tyranny has been in place, and she is fearful for her realPolitik....
Boy talk about the Massive Religious Conversion Moment in the Middle of A Time Of Transferring the Tax Liabilities Unto the Unborn...