drieuxster (drieuxster) wrote,
drieuxster
drieuxster

Scalitoisms v. Strict Constructionists

here is a truly scary thought. What if the folks in the Senate Judiciary Committee were to raise questions towards the Supreme Court Nominee with regards to the"'founding father's original intent" and a strict constitutional constructionists interpretation of the minimum requirement to invade another sovereign nation. Or would that mean that the Senate Judiciary Committee would have to grow enough stones to even become aware that the united states was obliged of international law to declare itself the occupying power in Iraq?
Subscribe

  • Who's Getting Who's Crazy On?

    Fox & MSNBC Reporters at Values Voters: Rude, Disruptive, Lazy - the folks at faith to action have another take on the values conference, where the…

  • The asymetric problem

    A friend of my recently raised the fear point - what happens when some stateless actor up and does a nuke strike on some american friendly space. { I…

  • Which family values?

    A man who had long been vocal in his opposition to abortion was shot to death Friday morning while staging an anti-abortion protest outside a…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 1 comment