drieuxster (drieuxster) wrote,
drieuxster
drieuxster

Why Do They Hate Us????

Mad Props To [Unknown LJ tag] for
An electronic system set up last month by the U.S. Department of Defense to help overseas soldiers and other military personnel and contractors cast ballots in U.S. elections lacks security safeguards, critics say.

The department’s Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP) launched a Web site on Sept. 1 to help military personnel and civilian employees access voting information and local ballots.

The program, dubbed the Integrated Voting Alternative Site (IVAS), provides instructions for personnel on how to submit local ballots by fax machine or e-mail, said J. Scott Wiedmann, deputy director of FVAP. The ballots are not directly cast by the agency for security reasons, he said.

Wiedmann noted that the program does not provide encryption for e-mailed ballots.

The site also lets personnel download a Federal Post Card Application (FPCA) form that can be filled out to request an absentee ballot from local elections officials, Wiedmann said.

David Wagner, a professor of computer science at the University of California, Berkeley, said submitting ballots via e-mail or fax presents myriad security problems.

For example, he said, unencrypted e-mails can be intercepted and read by others. Wagner also noted that the FPCA form requires the voter’s date of birth and Social Security number, which means soldiers face the risk of identity fraud by sending the form via fax or e-mail.

“No self-respecting bank would tell me to e-mail them my bank account number and Social Security number over unencrypted e-mail,” said Wagner. The IVAS system ought to provide the requisite secure communications, he said.

Wiedmann said that the IVAS site offers Secure Sockets Layer encryption and that it warns voters of e-mail security concerns. He also noted that the site warns that votes may be viewed by those collecting the data.

“It’s more important to these voters that they participate in the vote than in maintaining secrecy,” he said.

[ from New Military Voting Process Lacks Security, Critics Say ]
Hum, what if the NeoCons had meant something when they were screeching about the importance of the Military Vote.

You know, back in 2000.

Oh yeah, that was back when NeoCons were not trying to Hide Behind HanoiAnnie Coulter's Moisten Bint rather than stepping up and joining the US Military for ACTIVE DUTY ABROAD IN A HOSTILE FIRE PAY ZONE. You know those Halcyon days before the day that scared them so bad, that they wanted the Government to keep on having more and more power to torture anyone anywhere to keep them safer than thou, because as Party Loyalists their type never serve in the Military.

Well Thank You NeoConClownCarCrew....

Oh yeah, that's right, not only do they not care about the Military - but they are having a hard time getting their panties moist about those Pay-Day Bilkers who have been ripping of American Military Familys for decades now.... So why EVER would they care about something so trivial as the VOTE from some GI overseas.... It's not like those people are, well, you know, the sort that NeoCons want to move into their neighborhoods anyway...

Oh yeah, in case it is not clear - I so do not like VOCHAS!!!!
Subscribe

  • Who's Getting Who's Crazy On?

    Fox & MSNBC Reporters at Values Voters: Rude, Disruptive, Lazy - the folks at faith to action have another take on the values conference, where the…

  • The asymetric problem

    A friend of my recently raised the fear point - what happens when some stateless actor up and does a nuke strike on some american friendly space. { I…

  • Which family values?

    A man who had long been vocal in his opposition to abortion was shot to death Friday morning while staging an anti-abortion protest outside a…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments