February 22nd, 2008


Surgtastical or Hitlary....

Interesting flow here kiddies:
Iraqi radical Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr has extended for another six months a cease-fire between his Mahdi army militia and U.S. and Iraqi forces. Daniel Schearf reports from the northern Iraqi city of Irbil.
[ cf Shi'ite Cleric Extends Cease-Fire with US, Iraqi Forces ]
And now....
The closing scene -- and Hillary Clinton's last words -- at the crucial debate Thursday night in Texas set pundits to opine that, just perhaps, Clinton is coming to terms with the fact that she's not going to win the Democratic nomination.

In appearances on the three broadcast network morning shows today, Clinton did little to rebut that interpretation. Asked directly whether she would soldier on, no matter what happens in the make-or-break primaries in Ohio and Texas on March 4, she refused to say.

[ cf Clinton doesn't vow to go on beyond March 4 ]
Oh Me!!! Oh My!!!!

Are the Jihaudists trying to signal back to Hillary???

Would this be a bad time to remind americans that once there HipHop BuzzPhrase NeoCon Echo Chamber was whining that Hillary was signalling the Islamic Jihaudists. ( and yes boys and girls, in NeoCon land they do understand that there are more than merely Islamic Jihaudists, such as their Holy Warrior Christianist Friends, whom they regularly sacrifice when it is politically expedient.) Gosh, but if the NeoCon Echo Chamber was so correct on that point, then Gosh, the Surge was not as SurgeTastical as the white house has always said it has been....

But that would mean that the NeoCons, by their own standards, were stabbing the troops in the back by not supporting the president!!!!

There can be but one and only one solution here: BushCheney2008!!!!

Because anything less is Kapitulationist Appeaser Kut undt RunnerIsms!!!!

That Evil Liberal Media Meat Puppetry

Hey kids, let us once again put our little thinking caps on for a moment.

Can YOU really come up with a clear and compelling actual legal distinction between the authorization to use military style force against Iraq that was issues to Clinton, and the one issued to Dubya.

At which point, lacking any actual legal distinction, we have to start looking around for other clarifications for why it is that the nation is 'more at war' in one context than in the other....

In Steps the Scary News from the Evil Liberal Media.... McCain might be able to 'get some'.

And as we might have to worry, that would, gosh, well, mean, that rather than focusing the nation on the need to get more Dead, Maimed, and Wounded GI's, that, well, McCain, old salt that he is, well, geez, he could, you know, 'get some' on his OWN!!!

No need for the blood of the military to get wood!!!

So folks really need to start thinking hard about these issues.

DO You WANT TO HAVE SOMEONE WHO CAN 'GET SOME', or are you supporting the president to support the troops, no matter how many GI's have to DIE, GET MAIMED, OR WOUNDED, so the Prez can have an 'in lieu of getting some'.

No More CLEAR and COMPELLING argument can be put forward to support BushCheney2008, anything less and those slimey, sicko, Hippie Dopes Smoking Draft Dodging Free Roaming Sandle Clad Stinking Anti-WAR LEFTIES like McCain will want openly espouse Heterosexuality over TOTAL MILITARY VICTORY!!!!

Remember, it is not about polorizing, or 'wedge issues' - it is about stopping the Heterosexuals, before they can stop the Glorious WAR!!!