I know that we are suppose to be all dancing in the Streets That the President Admitted that we were able to kill a mother and child in the bombing attack that is alledged to have taken a major al-qaeda related player out of the contest in the Iraqi Civil War, as reported by Fox News.
But gosh, what about the reality check that there is parity between the 2 and 10 year Treasuries, and both of these are BELOW the Fed Funds Rate.
Should we be Killing More Iraqi's For Economic Parity In Treasuries? Or Should we be Killing More Iraqi's to help stabilize the slide in the American Dollar????
Or should we be Nuking Economic Threats To American Hegomony?

Hum... Back when the video of al-arqawi was the bad weapons handling, the ProWarButVOCHAS were all running around noting that of course it does not matter, since the guy doesn't know anything, therefore our having NOT actually killed him all of the times that we had claimed to have killed him really didn't matter.
Granted, back then some of us asked, "Ok, so who is running all of those killings in Iraq? The Girl Scouts?" and again, it really was not about anything more than 'stirring up the party base'.
Now we have Rumsfeld calling this a significant victory, but we are not going to see anything really significant from this action. Since, well, gosh, Dick Cheney is trying to prevent Sen. Arlen Spectre from doing the Judical Oversight that the senate is suppose to be doing.... Ooops, sorry, wrong war on america...
But I guess it is still working to 'stir up the party base' - since gosh, being honest and noting that the fiasco should get handed over to the UN, just like the North Vietnamese did with their failed little dirty war in Kampuchea, when they ousted the Evil Pol Pot, and things got all messed up....
Oh that's right, most americans can't remember which of their "war on good v. evil" they want to use as their model for which of the ones that they think we are currently in....