GlennBeckIstanianista have been opposing the Commander In Chief. Now we have terrorist bombings in Baghdad also attacking the Commander In Chief. So... Should we use the reasoning of GlennBeckIstanians and ask them if they are proud of themselves! And that their commitment to not supporting the president to support the troops has brought us to this moment?
Or should we remind them that the bombing is not perSe their fault, save of course where they have been caught out supporting the coup, and the calls for mutiney in the US Military.
What should be the policies in america?
Even more interesting a piece from back in March of 2009 After the Billionaires Plundered Alabama Town, Troops Were Called in ... Illegally - "We have to tolerate the inequality as a way to achieve greater prosperity and opportunity for all," says one Goldman Sachs adviser. But tell that to the people of Samson, Ala. Why were the fun filled folks in GlennBeckIstania unwilling to get all freaky about sending in american troops into american towns back when they could have at least justified their opposition to the CIC under actual american policy grounds.
All of which drives home that big fuggly question, what should be the policy positions that are still worth keeping in america?