drieuxster (drieuxster) wrote,
drieuxster
drieuxster

The SHRILL ONE failes to see the OBVIOUS CORRELATION

Indeed, activists made trouble in 2005 by asking Congressmen tough questions about policy. Activists are making trouble now by shouting Congressmen down so they can’t be heard.

It’s exactly the same thing, right?

[ cf One of these things is not like the other ]
Well OF COURSE!

When you ask a question of a congressman that involves factualism, that forces them to completely shut down back into the Fetal Faith Based Awareness Mode, that is the same thing as just not allowing some GOD HATING UNAMERICAN PRO-NORTH KOREAN KENYANISM from spewing their hate filled Unamericanism!

And then he notes
After that, the events were open only to demonstrated loyalists; you may recall the people arrested at a Bush Social Security event in Denver for the crime of … not being Bush supporters.
( op cit ( emphasis added ) )
You SEE! Radical Death Squading Masses Of Unamericanist BRUTALLY ATTACKING FREEDOM by not being Pro American!

See, very much the same exact thing!!!

Clearly the SHIRLL ONE!!!!! Continues to support the War President merely because he is in bed with the mere civilian president!
Tags: konspirakii
Subscribe

  • The men who stare at Goats

    Saw the film today. It was, as expected disturbing, and unsettling. But I think the adverts for the films before were even more unsettling. We walked…

  • Design gambits

    Hey kids, what if you had two competing cartridges? the S&W .44 and the .44 colt and you are competing to replace the old fashion, god fearing, all…

  • What should GlennBeckistania's response be to new bombing in Iraq?

    Hum.... GlennBeckIstanianista have been opposing the Commander In Chief. Now we have terrorist bombings in Baghdad also attacking the Commander In…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments