drieuxster (drieuxster) wrote,
drieuxster
drieuxster

Shrill One Supports Caron Trading

Carbon tariffs
There are three references, one to an editorial in the NYT that he likes, one about how the economcis of the idea can work, and the third to how the lawFare could work as well.

Thus it must be totally non-functional.
Tags: economics, lawfare
Subscribe

  • Is praying for the death of a president like a bad thing?

    Pastor Of Gun-Toter At Obama Event Prayed For Obama To Die Or are they really atheists, and hence do not believe that prayer is anything more than…

  • Danger Law Stuff

    Why Doesn’t the SEC Know about the Doctrine of Implied Waiver? HOLY radical judicial activists! what next! Open lawfare in america? { include…

  • go team venture

    ACLU Responds to DOJ Investigation of Gitmo Defense Lawyers - it seems that offering a legal defense is criminalish in a time of transferring the…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 2 comments