A federal judge declared a mistrial Tuesday in the case against an ice cream vendor from Lodi who was accused of lying to protect his son, who authorities say attended an al-Qaida training camp in Pakistan.Any Questions on why these cases should be conducted from within the Internment Camp System where they are no longer bothered by the debilitating HORROR of american law, and the prosecution is not obliged to actually present evidence, or that said evidence need be even the pre-ponderance of evidence.
Umer Hayat, 48, and his 23-year-old son were tried at the same time but given separate juries. The son's jury was still deliberating Tuesday.
The announcement of a mistrial in the father's case came one day after the jurors told U.S. District Court Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. they could not reach an unanimous decision after nearly two weeks of deliberations.
[ cf AmPravda: Mistrial Declared in California Terror Case ]
What needs to be the standard is that the Great Leader holds that the position is true, and that as a Decider, the Decider has decided!!!