drieuxster (drieuxster) wrote,
drieuxster
drieuxster

Supreme Court Still Stabbing Troops in Back!

The Supreme Court in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld affirmed that the executive can detain enemy fighters during wartime, but that case pertained directly only to the detention of Taliban fighters while the United States was at war with the Afghan government.
[ cf Debate Intensifies Over Preventive Detention ]
WHAT???? The supreme's limited the POW detention policy to only POWs?????

What next? Advocate that the GreatOne is not allowed a limited divine right to personal pre-emptive detention of unbelievers who have fallen into the Obamanation of not believing that the GreatOne is the True WarPresident called forth by the Argument From Divine Comedy?

Where will it end? Will americans have to live with the unconvicted allowed to walk around the streets in their town, merely because they were not convicted of unbelief??? It is just SHOCKING what these RadFemiNurfSaucies are willing to advocate in polite society!!!
Tags: law, war_crimes
Subscribe

  • The men who stare at Goats

    Saw the film today. It was, as expected disturbing, and unsettling. But I think the adverts for the films before were even more unsettling. We walked…

  • Design gambits

    Hey kids, what if you had two competing cartridges? the S&W .44 and the .44 colt and you are competing to replace the old fashion, god fearing, all…

  • What should GlennBeckistania's response be to new bombing in Iraq?

    Hum.... GlennBeckIstanianista have been opposing the Commander In Chief. Now we have terrorist bombings in Baghdad also attacking the Commander In…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 1 comment