drieuxster (drieuxster) wrote,

But doesn't the war president still have line item veto?

At issue, House GOP leaders say, was the late Tuesday night move by Democratic leaders to severely cut back on Republican amendments to a major appropriations bill that funds the Commerce, Justice and other departments.

Republicans had planned to introduce 127 amendments to the spending package, but Democratic House leaders balked, arguing that debating that many amendments would simply take too much time and decided to call a vote. At 8:00 p.m., Democrats cut off debate and called members back to the Capitol. One hour later Democrats closed the vote after prevailing over the GOP minority 179-124.

[ cf GOP protests Democrat shutdown on amendments ]
So clearly if there is a need to limit the spending, then the war president still has the majikal powers of the line item veto....

I mean, what happened to Supporting the WarPresident to support the No-Bid Contracts in a time of Transferring the tax liaiblities unto the unborn baby UBU?
Tags: war

  • The men who stare at Goats

    Saw the film today. It was, as expected disturbing, and unsettling. But I think the adverts for the films before were even more unsettling. We walked…

  • Design gambits

    Hey kids, what if you had two competing cartridges? the S&W .44 and the .44 colt and you are competing to replace the old fashion, god fearing, all…

  • What should GlennBeckistania's response be to new bombing in Iraq?

    Hum.... GlennBeckIstanianista have been opposing the Commander In Chief. Now we have terrorist bombings in Baghdad also attacking the Commander In…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.